Phys. Rev. Lett. 51, 1819–1822 (1983)Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?Received 4 April 1983; published in the issue dated 14 November 1983 The claim that the Clauser-Horne inequality S(ϕ)<~1 is valid for all local theories is criticized. The criticism is based on the author's proof that this universality claim is incompatible with the conservation law of angular momentum. There exists an infinity of counterexamples to the universality claim made for S(ϕ)<~1. So Clauser and Horne offer no valid proof of the nonlocality of the quantum formalism; consequently experiments like Aspect's cannot be said to refute Einsteinian locality. © 1983 The American Physical Society URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1819
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.51.1819
PACS:
03.65.Bz
See AlsoComment: Michael A. Horne and Abner Shimony, Comment on "Bell's Theorem: Does the Clauser-Horne Inequality Hold for All Local Theories?", Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1296 (1984). Comment: James T. Cushing, Comment on Angelidis's Universality Claim, Phys. Rev. Lett. 54, 2059 (1985). Reply: Thomas D. Angelidis, Angelidis Responds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1022 (1984). Reply: Thomas D. Angelidis, Angelidis Responds, Phys. Rev. Lett. 53, 1297 (1984). |
|
About | Terms and Conditions | Subscriptions | Search | Help
Use of the American Physical Society websites and journals implies that the user has read and agrees to our Terms and Conditions and any applicable Subscription Agreement. Physical Review®, Physical Review Letters®, Reviews of Modern Physics®, and Physical Review Special Topics® are trademarks of the American Physical Society.