corner
corner

Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1388–1390 (1991)

Does quantum mechanics violate the Bell inequalities?

Download: PDF (108 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Emilio Santos
Departamento de Física Moderna, Universidad de Cantabria, Santander, Spain

See Also: Erratum

Received 4 September 1990; published in the issue dated 18 March 1991

It is argued that any quantum probability should correspond to a ratio between the number of counts (positive results) in some measurement and the number of copies of the physical system initially prepared. Then, the proofs of Bell’s theorem are criticized on the grounds that the probabilities used to show a violation of the Bell inequalities do not fulfill that condition. A hidden-variables model is proposed which reproduces the results of the optical experimental tests of the inequalities, even with perfect polarizers and detectors.

© 1991 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1388
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.66.1388
PACS:
03.65.Bz, 42.50.Wm

See Also

Comment: A. I. Rae, Comment on ‘‘Does quantum mechanics violate the Bell inequalities?’’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2700 (1992).

Comment: Y. Ben-Aryeh and A. Postan, Comment on ‘‘Does quantum mechanics violate the Bell inequalities?’’, Phys. Rev. Lett. 68, 2701 (1992).

Erratum: Emilio Santos, Erratum: Does quantum mechanics violate the Bell inequalities? [Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 1388 (1991)], Phys. Rev. Lett. 66, 3227 (1991).