corner
corner

Phys. Rev. Lett. 92, 121302 (2004) [4 pages]

Limits on the Time Variation of the Electromagnetic Fine-Structure Constant in the Low Energy Limit from Absorption Lines in the Spectra of Distant Quasars

Download: PDF (234 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

R. Srianand1,*, H. Chand1,†, P. Petitjean2,3,‡, and B. Aracil2,§
1IUCAA, Post Bag 4, Ganeshkhind, Pune 411 007, India
2Institut d’Astrophysique de Paris, CNRS, 98bis Boulevard Arago, F-75014 Paris, France
3LERMA, Observatoire de Paris, 61 avenue de l’Observatoire, F-75014 Paris, France

See Also: Editorial Note

Received 12 November 2003; published 26 March 2004

See accompanying Physics Focus

We present the results of a detailed many-multiplet analysis performed on a new sample of Mg ii systems observed in high quality quasar spectra obtained using the Very Large Telescope. The weighted mean value of the variation in α derived from our analysis over the redshift range 0.4≤z≤2.3 is Δα/α=(-0.06±0.06)×10-5. The median redshift of our sample (z≃1.55) corresponds to a look-back time of 9.7 Gyr in the most favored cosmological model today. This gives a 3σ limit, -2.5×10-16≤(Δα/αΔt)≤+1.2×10-16  yr-1, for the time variation of α, that forms the strongest constraint obtained based on high redshift quasar absorption line systems.

© 2004 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.121302
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.92.121302
PACS:
98.80.Es, 06.20.Jr, 98.62.Ra

*Electronic address: anand@iucaa.ernet.in

Electronic address: hcverma@iucaa.ernet.in

Electronic address: ppetitje@iap.fr

§Electronic address: aracil@iap.fr

See Also

Comment: M. T. Murphy, J. K. Webb, and V. V. Flambaum, Comment on “Limits on the Time Variation of the Electromagnetic Fine-Structure Constant in the Low Energy Limit from Absorption Lines in the Spectra of Distant Quasars”, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 239001 (2007).

Reply: R. Srianand, H. Chand, P. Petitjean, and B. Aracil, Srianand et al. Reply:, Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 239002 (2007).

Editorial Note: R. Srianand, H. Chand, P. Petitjean, and B. Aracil, Editorial Note: Srianand et al. Reply [Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 239002 (2007)], Phys. Rev. Lett. 100, 029902 (2008).