corner
corner

Phys. Rev. Lett. 95, 010503 (2005) [4 pages]

No Signaling and Quantum Key Distribution

Download: PDF (83 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Jonathan Barrett1,2,*, Lucien Hardy3,†, and Adrian Kent4,‡
1Physique Théorique, Université Libre de Bruxelles, CP 225, Boulevard du Triomphe, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
2Centre for Quantum Information and Communication, CP 165/59, Université Libre de Bruxelles, Avenue F. D. Roosevelt 50, 1050 Bruxelles, Belgium
3Perimeter Institute, 35 King Street North, Waterloo, Ontario N2J 2W9, Canada
4Centre for Quantum Computation, DAMTP, Centre for Mathematical Sciences, University of Cambridge, Wilberforce Road, Cambridge CB3 0WA, United Kingdom

Received 19 May 2004; published 27 June 2005

See accompanying Physics Focus

Standard quantum key distribution protocols are provably secure against eavesdropping attacks, if quantum theory is correct. It is theoretically interesting to know if we need to assume the validity of quantum theory to prove the security of quantum key distribution, or whether its security can be based on other physical principles. The question would also be of practical interest if quantum mechanics were ever to fail in some regime, because a scientifically and technologically advanced eavesdropper could perhaps use postquantum physics to extract information from quantum communications without necessarily causing the quantum state disturbances on which existing security proofs rely. Here we describe a key distribution scheme provably secure against general attacks by a postquantum eavesdropper limited only by the impossibility of superluminal signaling. Its security stems from violation of a Bell inequality.

© 2005 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010503
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.95.010503
PACS:
03.67.Hk, 03.65.Ta, 03.65.Ud, 03.67.Dd

*Electronic address: jbarrett@perimeterinstitute.ca

Electronic address: lhardy@perimeterinstitute.ca

Electronic address: A.P.A.Kent@damtp.cam.ac.uk