corner
corner

Phys. Rev. Lett. 99, 177203 (2007) [4 pages]

Is a Griffiths Phase a Prerequisite for Colossal Magnetoresistance?

Download: PDF (1,014 kB) Buy this article Export: BibTeX or EndNote (RIS)

Wanjun Jiang*, XueZhi Zhou, and Gwyn Williams
Department of Physics and Astronomy, University of Manitoba, Winnipeg, MB R3T 2N2 Canada

Y. Mukovskii and K. Glazyrin
Moscow State Steel and Alloys Institute, Moscow 119049 Russia

Received 16 June 2007; revised 10 August 2007; published 23 October 2007

Detailed measurements of the magnetic and transport behavior of the two La1-xCaxMnO3 single crystals exhibiting colossal magnetoresistance are summarized. The x=0.21 sample exhibits unusual exponents (δ=20±1, γ=1.71±0.1, β=0.09±0.01, TC=182±1  K) and, more importantly, a Griffiths phase characterized by an exponent λ=0.70±0.2. By contrast, the x=0.20 specimen displays Heisenberg model behavior with no evidence of such a phase. Thus while a Griffiths phase accounts for the behavior of La1-xCaxMnO3 near optimal doping, it does not appear to be a prerequisite for colossal magnetoresistance in this system.

© 2007 The American Physical Society

URL:
http://link.aps.org/doi/10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.177203
DOI:
10.1103/PhysRevLett.99.177203
PACS:
75.40.Cx, 75.47.Lx

*jiang@physics.umanitoba.ca